Deixe um recado
Deixe um recado
Se você estiver interessado em nossos produtos e quiser saber mais detalhes, deixe uma mensagem aqui e responderemos o mais breve possível.
enviar
Lar Notícias

Why Do Common Weed Barrier Fabrics Fail? – A Material Comparison Based on an 8-Year Community Garden Experiment

Why Do Common Weed Barrier Fabrics Fail? – A Material Comparison Based on an 8-Year Community Garden Experiment

Nov 18, 2025

Application Scenario

A community garden in Phoenix, Arizona, USA, with over 300 days of annual sunshine and summer surface temperatures reaching up to 60°C. In 2020, two different types of weed barrier fabric were installed simultaneously in 150 of the garden's 300 planting beds: a common low-cost 80 gsm product (Group A) and our supplied 120 gsm high-strength, UV-resistant heavy-duty landscape fabric (Group B).

Specific Issues & Observations:

By spring 2024, the Group A fabric showed widespread embrittlement and tearing. Weed roots had penetrated the material, which crumbled easily when removed, indicating an average service life of only about 3.5 years. In contrast, the Group B fabric remained structurally intact except for minor weathering at the edges, effectively suppressing weeds with no root penetration.

 

 

Comparative Analysis:

Comparison Dimension

Group A

(80 gsm Low-Cost Product)

Group B

(120 gsm High UV-Resistance Product)

Impact on Garden Management
UV Stabilizer Content Less than 0.5%, rapidly depleted. Above 2.5%, with added carbon black for lasting protection.

 

Group A lost over 50% tensile strength after 18 months; Group B retained >70% after 4 years.

 

Weight & Structure 80 gsm, sparse non-woven fabric structure. 120 gsm, dense needle-punched nonwoven structure.

 

Group A is easily punctured by sharp stones or tools; Group B resists such damage effectively.

 

Water Permeability Too high, allows water but also fines to pass, leading to compaction. Optimized design, drains water quickly while retaining soil.

 

Soil under Group A compacts after irrigation, hindering infiltration; soil structure under Group B remains better.

 

Total Cost of Ownership Low initial unit cost, but requires replacement every 3-4 years with high labor/disposal costs. 30% higher initial investment, but expected lifespan >8 years, lower long-term cost.

 

For long-term projects like community gardens, Group B's total cost-effectiveness is about 40% higher.

 

 

 

Authoritative Conclusion

When selecting a weed barrier, weight (gsm) and UV additives are crucial metrics, not just price. For home gardens or long-term projects, investing in a heavy-duty weed barrier with ≥100 gsm and sufficient carbon black stabilizers results in significantly lower long-term maintenance costs and gardening difficulty compared to frequently replacing cheap products.

 

 

SOLICITE UM ORÇAMENTO

Se você estiver interessado em nossos produtos e quiser saber mais detalhes, deixe uma mensagem aqui e responderemos o mais breve possível.
ENTRE EM CONTATO
CONTATE-NOS
Vamos ter uma conversa produtiva.

Por meio de tecnologias inovadoras de materiais geotécnicos, construímos uma infraestrutura mais segura, durável e ecológica, e nos tornamos um parceiro confiável em soluções geotécnicas globais.

Servindo o mundo

Telefone : +86 -18005440164

Telefone : +86 -15621270096

Whatsapp : +86 -18005440164

Whatsapp : +86 -15621270096

E-mail : luna@nuokungeo.com

E-mail : jone@nuokungeo.com

Deixe um recado

Deixe um recado
Se você estiver interessado em nossos produtos e quiser saber mais detalhes, deixe uma mensagem aqui e responderemos o mais breve possível.
enviar
CONTATE-NOS :luna@nuokungeo.com

Lar

Produtos

whatsApp

contato